Thursday, January 27, 2005

Einstein and the Jewish Identity

Continuing the discussion of reason and education in America:

jinnderella asks:

It is fairly obvious to me that there is a biological basis for belief. But what does one do about it?

I can't tell you what to do about it. I can tell you what I did about it.

Shamanism (A Yaqui Way of Knowledge), living alone in the woods for several years. Working day and night to integrate my personality. Thinking about advanced electronics while visiting other worlds.

Copious study of Aleister Crowley.

Having an intense sense of the extatic while focusing intently on subjects only amenable to rationality.

Crowley liked to have sex while calling out moves in a chess game - now there is a strange way to have sex. A strange way to play chess.

I was talking day before yesterday (Tuesday) to a gentleman I had met for the first time. He pointed out to me without prompting that I was right brain / left brain integrated. I think that is the key.

Gurdjieff says that the prerequisite is a rigorous education in rationality followed by a re-connection to dance, music etc. The initial education must be in logical subjects with only enough music, dance, etc. to keep that section of the brain minimally active.

So there is sort of an outline there. Unfortunately we have given up the rigor for the feel good stuff. So what you get out of that is the lefty half-men we see about us today. The shame is that if the rationality is not done early enough it is very hard to do later.

I might add that efforts at classical music are very important to get started before age 13. They seem critical to the development of mathematical reasoning. Einstein played the violin. I do not think that was a mistake. Condi Rice is an accomplished classical pianists. I think that is a good sign.

The best rock musicians (in general) have been clasically trained. The best mathematicians have a musical avocation.

My boys tell me that "Star Wars" was a great help to their moral understanding.

Our modern day military men (American, Brits, Ozzies) seem to me to be pretty well integrated. They can do the physical stuff at the same time they make rational calculations. Our enemies seem to be less well put together, depending on exhuberance and emotion to make up for lack of technical ability. Ghost Dancers if you will.

So how is that for thinking aloud?

The very best among us still get the required education (gifted programs). It is the average student that is being short changed by the "self esteem" crowd.

Self esteem is built by suceeding in the face of difficulty not by the practice of watering down the course material so that almost all difficulty is gone.

Of course in America the rot runs deep. The only reason we do so well is that it is much worse every where else.

Bush's NCLB is an attempt to bring rigor back to the schools.

The more I look into Bush's programs the more I see true genius at work. He is an order of politician we haven't seen since Jefferson. I think he has the Jeffersonian spirtit if lacking in Jefferson's articulateness.

As part of training my children I did a lot of punning. i.e. mixing subjects and forcing a kind of cross thinking. My father did that with me.

In my family we call it "stupid Dad jokes".

The English language is particularly rich in that area.

It forces a way of thinking of two (or more) disparate subjects at once.

Zen koans are very good here. The Sufis seem to do something similar (thanks Joe of Winds of Change for your weeklys on the subject). Of course in huge parts of the Muslim world the Sufis are considered heretics.

A lot of it is the breaking of orthodoxies.

The Jewish emphasis on book learning seems to accomplish what is required. A lot could be learned from that culture. Part of that is the questioning of every thing. And the requirement to be able to make persuasive arguments on any side of a given subject. One must be able to argue not just for God but also the Devil. And the arguments must be equally well done.

The current Moslem trend is to demand orthodoxy which stunts thinking.

Unquestioning belief stunts the mind. It also stunts the moral sense.

Einstein had a bit to say about all this:

Although Einstein did not observe Jewish rituals, he strongly identified with Jewish tradition: "The pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, an almost fanatical love of justice, and the desire for personal independence—these are features of the Jewish tradition which make me thank my lucky stars that I belong to it." Einstein's strong support for Jewish welfare emerged when he faced anti-Semitism in Germany. Throughout his life, the man whose work the Nazis and German scientists dismissed as "Jewish physics" worked tirelessly against anti-Semitism.


Can you dance to reason?

There is an interesting discussion going on over at Winds of Change. This is one of my contributions to the thread:

--==--

Going to protests and actively participating makes you high. At least that was the effect on me when I marched in the 60s.

Too many here are treating what goes on as rational discourse (semi rational any way). The rational is the smallest and least effective part of the human brain.

Brain chemistry designed for animal survival has more to do with human nature than reason. Reason is hard (just try to get the average person interested - let alone capable - in partial differential calculus or quantum mechanics or Maxwell's theories or cross products in vector algebra) feeling good in the company of celebrating (whatever) humans is easier. We were tribal way before the invention of the steam engine.

I wonder if you can dance to reason? Or hum the tune?

Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Arab Aid to Muslim Tsunami Victims

A cartoon.

*

Dems revert to Klan roots

It seems that the Democrats are busy this week attacking a black woman who is in line for one of the highest positions in the American government.

"Dr. Rice is responsible for some of the most overblown rhetoric that the administration used to scare the American people," Sen. Robert Byrd , D-W.Va., said.

The Senate set aside most of the day Tuesday to debate the Rice nomination after Democrats revolted against a plan to confirm Rice last week, on the same day that Bush took his oath for a second term.

"We should have been done last week," Frist said. "I was disappointed that we are having to march through the debate today. But ultimately the vote will occur."

Republicans who took the floor to endorse Rice included Sen. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record), R-Neb., who has been a sometime critic of the Bush administration's Iraq policies.

"Dr. Rice has the intelligence, the integrity and the experience for this job. She has the president's confidence," Hagel said.
The Democrats really know how to pick their spokesman. Why if they have complaints against Dr. Rice would would they pick Senator KKK to voice them?

Well let us look into Senator KKK's roots:
Byrd was a local leader of the Ku Klux Klan for a period of time in the early 1940s, holding the title Kleagle; Klan recruiter. In a 1946 letter, he wrote, "The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia." However, when running for Congress in 1952, he announced, "After about a year, I became disinterested, quit paying my dues, and dropped my membership in the organization. During the nine years that have followed, I have never been interested in the Klan." Still, in 1964 he opposed the Civil Rights Act.
Isn't that special. Who to better speak out against Dr. Rice than an anti-Civil Rights Democrat. Who indeed. Well what about Byrd's recent history?
Senator Byrd quit the Klan in the 1940s and has renounced it since. On the other hand, his history is worth revisiting, since it's something Democrats have been willing to tolerate, despite Lott-like remarks that would have ended a Republican's career. Only last year Mr. Byrd told Fox News that "there are white niggers. I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time, if you want to use that word. But we all--we all--we just need to work together to make our country a better country and I--I'd just as soon quit talking about it so much."

Mr. Byrd quickly apologized, but he wasn't denounced by Democrats, much less by the Clintons. Nor did the press corps use the opportunity to wallow in other Byrd racial lowlights, such as the 14 hours and 13 minutes he spent in an unsuccessful filibuster during the debate over the 1964 civil rights act, which he voted against along with 20 other Senate Democrats. The political press also didn't dredge up his votes against both Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, votes that made him the only Senator to have opposed the only two black Supreme Court nominees in U.S. history.
Is the good Senator anti-Black? Could be. Thurgood Marshall was a Democrat.
Which U.S. Senator is a former member of the Ku Klux Klan?

Which U.S. Senator wasn't just a member of the KKK but was a "Kleagle" -- an official recruiter who signed up members for $10 a head?

Which U.S. Senator said he joined because it "offered excitement" and because the Klan was an "effective force" in "promoting traditional American values."

Which U.S. Senator wrote the following, three years after he claims to have ended his ties with the KKK: "The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia" and "in every state in the Union."

Which U.S. Senator also wrote that he would never fight "with a Negro by my side. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."
Which Senator indeed.

The Democrats ought to be ashamed of themselves.

If that is possible.

Welcome Instapundit fans. And Roger Simon fans. And Captain's Quarters fans.

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Stand up and be counted

I'm over at Al Bawaba again arguing with the leftys and other active and passive supporters of the throat slitters. Al is one of the Leftys. Faust is a Marine who now provides security and other services as a contractor in the war zone.

--==--

A letter to Al,

"Who will stop the fascists" is not a pompous question Al.

So far in the last 70 years in every generation men are asked to make that choice. Some times several times in a generation.

To tell the truth in 1971 I sided with Kerry and the fascists. I'm not proud of it but there it is.

By 1980 I had seen where that led. I have the Vietnamese Boat People, the Re-ed camps, and 2 million Cambodians on the debit side of my ledger.

There is no way I'm going down that road again.

The first time I was asked the question I sided with the fascists. When Ronald Regan asked the question again in 1980 I sided with the good guys (not perfect - just good). I have been on the side of the good guys ever since.

A word to the wise Al, actively fighting fascism (you know - the throat slitters) will make you feel better than actively or passively supporting them.

If I had Faust's skills I'd be going where he is going. What I have to do to support the war lies along a different path. I'm a maker. So I help make the tools of war. Software I have written flys on the F-16. I'm working on other stuff as well.

Do I like all of Bush's plans and programs?

No.

The drug war is stupid. Making churches and charities dependent on government is a bad idea. I have several other problems with his positions. But by god he fights the fascists. Their towers are coming down. And even if I can only pull on a thread I wish to add my energy and will to his.

Do you see how it is?

For the really important work men of good will (even those of bad character) will unite and die that other men might live free.

The men and women of Iraq are dying to vote. Bush and our valiant soldiers have given them the opportunity. I must stand with the Iraqi people, Bush, and our brave boys and girls. We don't sing of "the land of the free and the home of the brave" for nothing.

Stand up and be counted Al.

Stand up and be counted.

Monday, January 24, 2005

Signs of the Times

A local company (in the Rock River Valley) is making signs for the Iraqi elections.

MACHESNEY PARK -- Signs made in the Rock River Valley will let Iraqis know their polling places are safe as they vote next week during national elections.

The iridescent signs were printed by Interstate Graphics Inc., a nearly 20-year-old printing company in Machesney Park owned by John Norwood Sr. and his sons, John and Jim.

The U.S. government awarded the Norwoods the job Dec. 29 with a tight deadline -- the 8,000 signs had to arrive in Fort Lewis, Wash., on or before Jan. 7. From there, they would go on a plane bound for Iraq.

"The U.S. government puts out the order, and you roll the dice and bid," John Norwood Sr. said. "Our competitive price and the quick turnaround on the order was a big part of the deal."
The signs will be used to mark and seal polling places that have been inspected for weapons and bombs. The signs which can be seen here. The logo on the signs is a yellow lightening bolt on a red background. The design looked familiar to a local resident.
To his surprise, John Norwood Sr. [President of the Sign company] received a call from Belvidere resident Elaine Huska this week after she saw the signs on TV. The Norwoods didn't know much about the sign's design, but Huska told them the illustration is the symbol for the 25th Infantry Division (Light) from Schofield Barracks, Hawaii.

The division is nicknamed the "Tropic Lighting," and has fought in every major conflict since World War II. The taro leaf pictured is native to Hawaii, and the red and gold colors are those of the late Hawaiian monarchy, according to the division's Web site.

Huska's son, 25-year-old Sgt. Kenneth O'Dell Jr., is a member of the division. He enlisted during high school and was wounded in September after an explosion in Iraq.

Seeing the signs reminded Huska of her son and gave her renewed hope in the army's efforts.

"I recognized it immediately and said, 'That's Kenny's insignia,'" Huska said. "I told him this is what you were fighting for. It's amazing. He really believes in what they're doing over there."
Now our local paper (The Rockford Register Star) has not been too supportive of the war. But stories like this, the President's recent Democracy and Freedom speech, the picture of election workers killed in the streets of Baghdad, and the Z-Man's announcement about being against democracy has started to turn their thinking.

About time.

Humans prevent ice age

What ever happened to global warming? I did a piece a while back that looked at the latest research. The conclusion of that research is that global warming is probably solar induced.

Well not so fast. Some new research shows that man may be preventing the coming of an ice age.

Anthropologist Dr Benny Peiser, from Liverpool John Moores University, said: "If the research findings are correct, a radical change in the perception of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions will be required.

"Instead of driving us to the brink of environmental disaster, human intervention and technology progress will be seen as vital activities that have unintentionally delayed the onset of a catastrophic ice age."
Instapundit has a link to the article (for Science Digest Readers - free or you can pay $30). You can read an abstract of the article for free. The abstract "A test of the overdue-glaciation hypothesis" is pretty complete with charts graphs and footnotes. Worth a look.

via Instapundit

Capitalist Socialism

The Democrats will continue to lose to the Republicans on economic issues not just in America but in the world for the simple reason that the Republicans have read and assimilated DeSoto and the Democrats have not.

DeSoto (who tried to figure out why capitalism creates wealth in some places and not in others) found that man is a naturally capitalistic animal. Thus the more people who can become capitalists in a society the more wealth created. His prescription was to turn peasants into owners.

Now Bush has turned this understanding of man's nature into a slogan: "the ownership society".

This is all some what surprising because the movement DeSoto espouses is essentially leftist: giving the poor property rights in the land they work and the houses they build in a way that enhances capital formation.

Since there is not much free land left in America what Bush proposes is to give the poor an ownership position in the tax on their labor i.e. Social Security reform.

Socialism that is anti-Capitalist is a dead end.

Saturday, January 22, 2005

Social Security - The Big Fix

We tax the people to pay for the government.

How about taxing the government to pay for the people?

The Feds have lots of land.

Why not sell some?

--==--

Inspired by Just One Minute. Just say Instapundit sent me.

Armor Geddon

I was doing a review of the mil sites on my blog roll looking for this quote:

"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."

Which I found here.

And I came across Armor Geddon. A very interesting site with lots of good war stories. Armored of course.

And I would have been living at FOB WARHORSE, which is paradise compared to FOB Scunion. The food, the gym, the nice phones, the entertainment that comes there. The only group that came here was the 1st ID Band. And they were damn good. God bless them for being the only ones to visit us. And I would not have had to pull force protection and guard duty on the towers in this FOB. And no more tank maintenance and changing two sides of track every 3 weeks. The tank maintenance was blowing us out of the water at the time. We had put a year’s worth of OPTEMPO on our tanks in 3 months. The BRT, on the other hand, had humvees which are a joke in terms of maintenance. And they did a lot of the high profile raids and missions. They were around for most HIC situations.

Well the only reason I turned it down was because of the men I was with. SGT P made me laugh my ass off every single day of the week. SSG Terry. Well he speaks for himself. But I remember him saying again and again how we were the tightest this platoon has ever been. And we were like a family. I loved my crew. And my platoon sergeant was an awesome NCO to be partners with. Laid back, easy to work with and competent as hell. There was no way I was going to choose to give up this family. Plus, I had only been with my platoon for 6 months at the time. I wanted to be with them longer. Now I’m on month 16 and still running. That’s unheard of these days. I consider myself the luckiest platoon leader in the army. I joined these guys before the mission readiness exercise in October of 2003. I went to a gunnery in January and deployed with them. We've been through major combat and now we are all coming home together in a few months. It doesn’t get any better than that.
Go and browse around. Lots of good stuff. Here is some more:
“Hey Langford, pass me another muffin," I called to my loader. He reached over to his stowage box and pulled a few Otis Spunkmeyer muffins for SGT P and me. This and Gatorade was all we had put in our mouths so far. And for me, plenty of Levi Garret chewing tobacco as well. I never smoked cigarettes, except for that one SGT P gave me right before entering Baqubah. And that was only because in the mad dash of things, I had left my chew behind. But the nicotine helped us all stay awake now. And the muffins kept us full. They were like 300 hundred calories each. And that’s all we had eaten for the past 2 days and 2 nights.

Oh sure, support guys had brought chow out to the LRP. But who had time to eat chow from Camp Fallujah when you were in the middle of battle? Well, the guys on the ammo and fuel trucks did. But we came in to get fuel; there was no time to eat. Our wingmen and scouts were in the fight and we just raced back here to juice up the tanks and get our asses back in the shit. If our pigs didn't guzzle so much JP8, I'd never leave the battlefield.

We had spent the night in our tanks again, observing the eastern side of the city with little activity. There wasn't a soul in sight. For all that hype the intelligence folks warned us about the bad guys having night vision capabilities, they sure didn’t fight much at night.
And more:
The 25mm was like a sledgehammer when you were right next to it. Oh man, it made my head hurt. SGT P didn’t feel a damn thing down in the turret. But I loved loud noises. I stared at the gun. Each round was a red laser beam zipping out of the cannon. The car danced with each round that impacted. It looked like a beast was inside and he was punching his way out. The hood rose up. The door blew out. The tire exploded. The roof bowed out. It reminded me of that scene in Ghostbusters 2 when Ray puts that pink slime in the toaster and it starts dancing to music. The car didn’t detonate. “Ok, that’s enough”

DoD hacked?

I'm trying to look up some stories on the 1ID and other DoD stuff and I keep getting a not found.

Here is the url:

http://www.1id.army.mil/1ID/Press_Release/

and another

http://www.dod.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20041224-secdef1902.html

Gun Porn

Gun Porn.

This is work safe. Except in Saudi Arabia.

Start of the American Jihad

I have been thinking about the Bush inaugural speech and what it means.

To me it marks the official opening of the American jihad. That is it is not just a war against evil doers. It is a war for something.

The master stroke by Bush is to declare freedom not just an American ideal, or a Western ideal, but a universal ideal. Who can argue against that? At least in America Bush has co-opted his enemies and given hope to the oppressed of the world. All that is left is the fight over methods.

Natan Scharansky talks about how much Regan's speech on liberty and the Evil Empire meant to him and other freedom lovers in Soviet prisons.

I think this speech to the wider world will have a similar effect. Bush said in his speech:

When the Declaration of Independence was first read in public and the Liberty Bell was sounded in celebration, a witness said, "It rang as if it meant something." In our time it means something still. America, in this young century, proclaims liberty throughout all the world, and to all the inhabitants thereof. Renewed in our strength - tested, but not weary - we are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom.


I also note that the actual words on the Liberty Bell are:

"Proclaim liberty throught the land and to all the inhabitants there of."

I suggested a change in the wording over at Winds of Change on 25 Nov. 2003. Here is what I suggested:
I remember the Liberty Bell. "Proclaim liberty throught the land and to all the inhabitants there of." I would add just one thing to it: "Proclaim liberty throught the lands and to all the inhabitants there of." Good words to live by. Good words to die for. Good words to pay for. Being free men here we will find a way or make one.
Do you suppose Bush is a Simon/Winds of Change fan? I hope so.

Thursday, January 20, 2005

The French Have a Few Words for Americans

"I want to tell you God bless President Bush and God bless United States of America."

This from a Frenchman?

Well yes. Hard to believe I know.

NewSisyphus tells the whole story here.

He(she?) also has an excellent article on how so many Western governments got captured by the left.

IOKIYAR

You are probably wondering what that means.

It is another term of learned helplessness that the Democrats love to use. I found it on KOS and a number of left sites and so I went hunting. What could it mean?

It's OK If You Are a Republican.

Kind of like the Republicans are getting away with all kinds of stuff that leftys would be persecuted for.

Kind of like Clinton getting away with Monica. (The thought of that poor Jewish girl down on her knees while Clinton was talking with Arafat. Why its almost enough to make you want to become a Democrat. Its almost enough to make you want to talk to Arafat - he's still dead Jim. Well opportunities lost.)

It is probably true though. Every administration has its little problems that power lets it sweep under the rug. Like the Mark Rich pardon.

Politics.

I still like it.

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

The Emperor On the Net

Jack Herer's "The Emperor Has No Clothes" is now available on the net. In case you are not familiar with it it covers how hemp could solve a lot of our environmental problems. Food, fuel, fiber. He also has chapthers on medical marijuana.

You can get it here:

The Emperor.

I met Jack a number of years ago when he came to Rockford for a rally. He is very passionate. He is also a very nice guy.

Jack is offering a reward if you can find serious factual errors in his book:

Prove us wrong! Prove us wrong! Prove us wrong! And we hereby extend our $100,000 challenge to prove us wrong!

If all fossil fuels and their derivatives, as well as trees for paper and construction, were banned in order to save the planet, reverse the greenhouse effect and stop deforestation; then there is only one known annually renewable natural resource that is capable of providing the overall majority of the world's paper and textiles; meet all of the world's transportation, industrial and home energy needs, while simultaneously reducing pollution, rebuilding the soil and cleaning the atmosphere all at the same time... and that substance is the same one that has done it before . . . CANNABIS/HEMP/MARIJUANA!

Figuring Out How to Win

The Democrats have finally figured out how to win. Kos tells them how:

The Democrats need to offer an alternative agenda over the next four years. It won't be enacted, so they can shoot for the moon. The hell with good policy, make proposals that sound great.
So there you have it. No need to be responsible. No need to give voters good choices. No more offering guidance and doing the do-able. Shoot for the moon.

That will work.

Kos I believe has an unbroken record. All his candidates lose.

I think he is working to extend his streak.

Keep up the good work Kos.

The hell with the Republic. It is not about governing. It is about winning. With promises that cannot be kept.

And people wonder why politicians rate below used car salesmen.

And people wonder why the Democrats rate below the Republicans.


--==--

Welcome Instapundit Readers.

Cursing on stage at Inaugural Kids Concert

Using words uttered by Dick Cheney on the floor of the Senate, band Fuel, welcomed every one to the greatest xxx country in the world.

Republicans (and Democrats at the FCC) were outraged.

Well any way I guess they were saved from the evil Republican "Kid Rock".

The Weekly Standard has a nice bit about South Park Conservatives. The kind of people who might be at home at just such a concert. Are there problems in Republican paradise. You bet:

Is there a downside to the rise of South Park conservatism? I ask. "It can be," as its critics claim Anderson notes, "kind of nihilistic, profane, and vulgar." And, of course, "it will offend a lot of people." But, he says, "the biggest danger is that the activism and the attitude might replace an engagement with ideas."

Anderson continues: "You don't want to see it as a whole ethos of life. . . . If there weren't any respect for higher culture, it wouldn't be conservatism."
The Republicans are morphing.

Me? I'm a Jack Ryan Republican.

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Lessons of This War - New Every Day

The New Yorker has a really good article on how we are learning to fight this war in real time.

During the early weeks of the Iraq war, the television set in my office was tuned all day to CNN, with the sound muted. On the morning of April 3rd, as the Army and the Marines were closing in on Baghdad, I happened to look up at what appeared to be a disaster in the making. A small unit of American soldiers was walking along a street in Najaf when hundreds of Iraqis poured out of the buildings on either side. Fists waving, throats taut, they pressed in on the Americans, who glanced at one another in terror. I reached for the remote and turned up the sound. The Iraqis were shrieking, frantic with rage. From the way the lens was lurching, the cameraman seemed as frightened as the soldiers. This is it, I thought. A shot will come from somewhere, the Americans will open fire, and the world will witness the My Lai massacre of the Iraq war. At that moment, an American officer stepped through the crowd holding his rifle high over his head with the barrel pointed to the ground. Against the backdrop of the seething crowd, it was a striking gesture—almost Biblical. “Take a knee,” the officer said, impassive behind surfer sunglasses. The soldiers looked at him as if he were crazy. Then, one after another, swaying in their bulky body armor and gear, they knelt before the boiling crowd and pointed their guns at the ground. The Iraqis fell silent, and their anger subsided. The officer ordered his men to withdraw.
The author of this article, Dan Baum, tracks down the officer and asks him where he learned that technique. The answer: he improvised. Further on the article goes into how the net is helping keep the troops up to date.
In March of 2000, with the help of a Web-savvy West Point classmate and their own savings, they put up a site on the civilian Internet called Companycommand.com. It didn’t occur to them to ask the Army for permission or support. Companycommand was an affront to protocol. The Army way was to monitor and vet every posting to prevent secrets from being revealed, but Allen and Burgess figured that captains were smart enough to police themselves and not compromise security.
Now here is some of the advice you can get excerpted from the site:
Never travel in a convoy of less than four vehicles. Do not let a casualty take your focus away from a combat engagement. Give your driver your 9mm, and carry their M16/M4. Tootsie Rolls are quite nice; Jolly Ranchers will get all nasty and sticky though. If a person is responsible for the death of an individual, they do not attend during the three days of mourning; that is why if we kill an individual in sector, we are not welcome during the mourning period. Soldiers need reflexive and quick-fire training, using burst fire. If they’re shooting five to seven mortar rounds into your forward operating base, whatever you’re doing needs to be readjusted. The more aggressive you look and the faster you are, the less likely the enemy will mess with you. It is okay to tell your soldiers what the regulation is; but as a commander, you should make the effort to get the soldier home for the birth. A single wall of sandbags will not stop any significant munitions. Take pictures of everything and even, maybe more importantly, everyone. The right photo in the right hands can absolutely make the difference. It’s not always easy to reach the pistol when in the thigh holster, especially in an up-armored humvee. If they accept you into the tent, by custom they are accepting responsibility for your safety and by keeping on the body armor, you are sending a signal that you do not trust them. If tea or coffee are offered, be sure to accept the items with the right hand. Do not look at your watch when in the tent. Have the unit invest in Wiley X’s—these sunglasses also serve as sun-wind-dust goggles. Supply each soldier with one tourniquet; we use a mini-ratchet strap that is one inch wide and long enough to wrap around the thigh of a soldier. Cotton holds water. Even with the best socks, and plenty of foot powder, your feet are likely to start peeling like you’ve never experienced. You’re more likely to be injured by not wearing a seatbelt than from enemy activity. You need to train your soldiers to aim, fire, and kill. The average local is terrible at trying to read a map; however they do understand sketches—the simpler the better. The second you see your soldiers start to lose interest, or roll their eyes, or not pay attention, your S2 has failed and you, your soldiers, and the mission are in danger. Vary the departure and return times, vary the routes even if the route includes a U turn, doesn’t make sense, etc. Let’s talk about what not to bring: perishable food, lighter fluid, porn, alcohol, or personal weapons. But you might be able to get away with a Playboy or two as long as you’re not stupid about it. The 9mm round is too weak, go for headshots if you use it.
The rest of the article is really great. Up until the end. Where it goes into the usual uber civilized "the Iraqis hate us and victory is no where in sight. And Oh, by the way its just like Viet Nam". It has way more interesting military stuff, if you can over look their politics. Worth a read.

Via Strategypage

Palis change their minds

Haaretz has an interesting article on the latest polling in the Palestinian polity.

Some 54 percent of the Palestinians support a two-state solution on the basis of the 1967 lines, with border corrections and no massive return of refugees, confirming that there has been a change in Palestinian public opinion since the death of Yasser Arafat.

The findings of a comprehensive public opinion poll among 1,319 respondents conducted at the end of December contrast with those of a similar poll done in December 2003, which showed only 39 percent of the Palestinians supported an agreement with Israel. And a parallel poll, conducted in Israel among a representative sample of Jewish and Arab voters, showed that 64 percent are now in favor of a permanent peace agreement, compared to only 47 percent who supported such a deal in a similar poll last year.
This is good. Perhaps reason is finally getting a chance.
Some 63 percent of the Palestinians support the proposal that after the establishment of the state of Palestine and a solution to all the outstanding issues - including the refugees and Jerusalem - a declaration will be issued recognizing the state of Israel as the state of the Jewish people and the Palestinian state as the state of the Palestinian people. Some 35 percent of the Palestinians oppose such a declaration. In June 2003, 52 percent supported such a proposal, and 46 percent were opposed.

On the Israeli side, 70 percent supported the proposal for mutual recognition, and 16 percent were opposed. In 2003, 65 percent supported the proposal and 33 percent were opposed.
Hmmmmm. Israel will recocgnize the Palis but the Palis will not recognize the Israelis until there is "a solution to all the outstanding issues".

I wonder if we can apply that rule to the French?

The Cat is Out of the Bag

Seymour Hersh says American troops are doing recon in Iran. Now there is a surprise. Why would they be doing that? Is it unclear or nuclear? Footballs discusses it. With more here.

Now the thing to figure out is: why was it leaked now? To test public opinion? Prevent an attack? Give Bush an opportunity to warn Iran again: "Nothing is off the table".

Certainly it is no news to Iran that they were being probed.

I think this is part of the run up to war.

It will be called a strike on nuclear weapons facilities. It will develop as an insurrection. American troops will go in to keep order and prevent nuclear materials and other weapons from getting into the hands of insurgents.

Our failures in Iraq will be the reason for going into Iran.

Sunday, January 16, 2005

French reporter - child (al-Durra) not killed by Israelis

Get the whole sordid story of the Mohammed al-Durra affair.

The boy whose "death" helped fuel the stupidfada may not be dead at all. Did I mention the French were involved?

Claiming they didn't want to make money on an innocent child's death, France 2 distributed the dramatic coverage free of charge to the global media. The Israeli army hastily issued a statement saying that the boy may have accidentally been killed in Israeli cross-fire. Only later, maybe too late, did the army authorize a full investigation. It entrusted this mission to civilian physicist Nahum Shahaf, who scientifically proved that -- given the angle of the Israeli position vis-a-vis Mohammed al-Durra -- the soldiers could not have possibly killed the boy. Mr. Shahaf then uncovered an incredible plot: He demonstrated that since the shots must have come from directly behind or next to the cameraman, the whole scene of the supposed infanticide must have been staged -- and that the boy seen in the film was not killed at all. Going through the film in slow motion, he could even see the cameraman's finger making a "take two" sign, used by professionals to signal the repeat of a scene.
So the whole thing was staged? How could that be? One of the reporters stated under oath that the boy was killed. One of only dozens of reporters at the scene who could confirm the boy was dead.
On that Friday, Mr. Rosenzweig, together with Denis Jeambar, editor-in-chief of L'Express, and Daniel Leconte, a former France 2 reporter, was admitted into the office of Arlette Chabot, the head of France 2's news department. Our friend delivered the sentence we had rehearsed so many times: "I came to watch the 27 minutes of the incident mentioned in Mr. Abu Rahma's statement under oath."

A legal clerk for France 2 told Mr. Rosenzweig and his colleagues that they "will be disappointed." "Didn't you know ?" added Didier Epelbaum, an adviser to the president of France Television (the department presiding over all French state-operated TV networks) "that Talal has retracted his testimony?"
So the statement about the boy's death, which is the only definitive proof of death has been retracted? That is interesting.
....how is it possible that France 2 still stands by this story even though it knows it was filmed by someone who gave a false testimony and who, by retracting this testimony, effectively eliminated the whole basis of the report? For four years, France 2 has been holding the "27-minute footage," pretending it contained crucial evidence, knowing full well though that both of their journalists simply lied. France 2 must be held responsible for this manipulation, first for issuing this fabrication and then for not coming clean.
Well, read the whole thing. There is much more evidence. It makes France look bad and the Palestinians worse. Make my day.

How to Save Social Security

I was looking at a site that Instapundit mentioned and I came across this brilliant idea to save Social Security.

It is really so simple.

The government should just raise the interest rate it pays on the bonds in the lock box. So simple really. If the Goverment chooses the rate correctly Social Security will never run out of money.

On the other side

Blackfive has a very nice piece on media bias in the war by LTC Tim Ryan, CO, 2/12 Cav, 1st Cav Div. You should send this in a polite way to every newspaper and TV station you can.

What if domestic news outlets continually fed American readers headlines like: "Bloody Week on U.S. Highways: Some 700 Killed," or "More Than 900 Americans Die Weekly from Obesity-Related Diseases"? Both of these headlines might be true statistically, but do they really represent accurate pictures of the situations? What if you combined all of the negatives to be found in the state of Texas and used them as an indicator of the quality of life for all Texans? Imagine the headlines: "Anti-law Enforcement Elements Spread Robbery, Rape and Murder through Texas Cities." For all intents and purposes, this statement is true for any day of any year in any state. True -- yes, accurate -- yes, but in context with the greater good taking place -- no! After a year or two of headlines like these, more than a few folks back in Texas and the rest of the U.S. probably would be ready to jump off of a building and end it all. So, imagine being an American in Iraq right now.
He goes on to say:
I just read yet another distorted and grossly exaggerated story from a major news organization about the "failures" in the war in Iraq. Print and video journalists are covering only a small fraction of the events in Iraq and more often than not, the events they cover are only the bad ones. Many of the journalists making public assessments about the progress of the war in Iraq are unqualified to do so, given their training and experience. The inaccurate picture they paint has distorted the world view of the daily realities in Iraq. The result is a further erosion of international public support for the United States' efforts there, and a strengthening of the insurgents' resolve and recruiting efforts while weakening our own. Through their incomplete, uninformed and unbalanced reporting, many members of the media covering the war in Iraq are aiding and abetting the enemy.

The fact is the Coalition is making steady progress in Iraq, but not without ups and downs. War is a terrible thing and terrible things happen during wars, even when you are winning. In war, as in any contest of wills with capable opponents, things do not always go as planned; the guys with the white hats don't always come out on top in each engagement. That doesn't mean you are losing. Sure, there are some high profile and very spectacular enemy attacks taking place in Iraq these days, but the great majority of what is happening in Iraq is positive.
He goes on to say how to get educated in guerilla warfare.
So what are the credentials of these self proclaimed "experts"? The fact is that most of those on whom we rely for complete and factual accounts have little or no experience or education in counter-insurgency operations or in nation-building to support their assessments. How would they really know if things are going well or not? War is an ugly thing with many unexpected twists and turns. Who among them is qualified to say if this one is worse than any other at this point? What would they have said in early 1942 about our chances of winning World War II? Was it a lost cause too? How much have these "experts" studied warfare and counter-insurgencies in particular? Have they ever read Roger Trinquier's treatise Modern Warfare: A French View on Counter-insurgency (1956)? He is one of the few French military guys who got it right. The Algerian insurgency of the 1950s and the Iraq insurgency have many similarities. What about Napoleon's campaigns in Sardinia in 1805-07? Again, there are a lot of similarities to this campaign. Have they studied that and contrasted the strategies? Or, have they even read Mao Zedung's theories on insurgencies, or Nygen Giap's, or maybe Che' Gueverra's? Have they seen any of Sun Zsu's work lately? Who are these guys? It's time to start studying, folks. If a journalist doesn't recognize the names on this list, he or she probably isn't qualified to assess the state of this or any other campaign's progress.
There is more. Read it all.

Via Instapundit

Conflicting signals

There is a report of a Palestinian pollster who says:

"The public continues to be split in its attitude toward violence. Many of those who voted for Abu Mazen did so even though they do not reject the use of force. They voted for the whole package that the man presented to the public, which includes reforms in the regime, the elimination of corruption and a challenge to [Yasser] Arafat's style," says Shikaki.

Shikaki is among those who do not believe that violence advances Palestinian interests.

However, Shikaki concludes that the theory that Abbas' victory promises quieter days for the Negev town of Sderot - hard hit by Palestinian Qassam rocket attacks - is off the mark.
And yet a different Jerusalem Post article has this to say:
The Palestinians have already confounded cynics by embarking on a relatively smooth transition of power immediately after Yasser Arafat's death and later holding the Arab world's first free presidential election.

"Today the Arabs are jealous of us," boasted Palestinian political analyst Hasan al-Batal.

After four years of fighting, which have resulted in thousands of casualties and the destruction of the economy and infrastructure, a steadily increasing number of Palestinians are now convinced that the time has finally arrived for real changes. Moreover, a growing number of people in Ramallah, Nablus and Jenin seem to be searching for a ladder on which to climb down from the high tree where Arafat left them. In other words, they are seeking a face-saving solution that will prevent their cause from sinking in the quagmire.

Abbas promised during the election campaign to follow in Arafat's footsteps, but those who know him say they nearly fell off their chairs when they heard him talk so highly of his predecessor.

It's no secret that Abbas and Arafat were at loggerheads for many years. The dispute between the two peaked in 2003, when Arafat, under pressure from the US and various European countries, reluctantly agreed to appoint Abbas the first prime minister of the Palestinian Authority.
Ah, but that is not the only difference of opinion. Haaretz has this about the recent attack at the Gaza Erez crossing:
The deadly terror attack is meant to show the world that Abbas is helpless, both in the political and security fields. It aims to illustrate that Abbas needs "mediators" who will enable him to control the armed groups, and that he cannot quell the anger of Hamas and Fatah.

If Arafat was seen as the leader who could end the armed uprising, but chose not to do so, Thursday's attack portrays Abbas as a leader who may wish to end the armed struggle, but cannot do so.
The Netscape/AP has a different take:
RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) - Mahmoud Abbas extended his hand in peace to Israel as he was sworn in as the new Palestinian leader Saturday, but he faced a series of crises that imperiled those fledgling moves and raised questions about the elections that brought him to power.

Israeli army fire killed seven Palestinians in the Gaza Strip a day after Israel cut all ties with Abbas until he reins in militants. The boycott came after six Israelis were killed during an attack at a Gaza cargo crossing this week.

Also, 46 election officials resigned Saturday over alleged irregularities in the Jan. 9 balloting that gave Abbas a landslide victory with more than 62 percent of the vote.

In his inaugural speech, Abbas condemned violence, urged an immediate cease-fire and said he was extending Israel his hand in peace.

Officials in Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's office called the speech disappointing, saying it did not define how Abbas would end attacks on Israel.
Of course the real question is not how he will do it. It is a question of can he do it at all.

Inside Israel there is disagreement on how to procede.
MK Ran Cohen said Sharon should remember that Abbas's rivals are "dangerous terrorists," and the response to them should be to respond positively to Abbas's peace gestures. Cohen also said Sharon may miss the chance to carry out the disengagement plan bilaterally.
My take is that is exactly what Sharon has done. Sharon says there will be no Israeli exit from Gaza under fire. I'd say that is about as bilateral as you can get.


Friday, January 14, 2005

They are not making things easy

By now you probaly have heard of the attack on the Erez crossing between Israel and the Gaza strip.

The Jerusalem Post and Haaretz have the story as does Yahoo/Reuters.

Israel has closed the border between Gaza and Israel to all but humanitarian traffic. i.e. food and medicine.

What is most interesting is this quote from the Haaretz article:

Brig. Gen. Abir Kochavi, commander of the Gaza Division, said Friday that the amount of goods that will be allowed into Gaza will be cut drastically following the attack, but that the army would do what it could to reduce damage to innocent civilians.

"This is a central crossing through which merchandise, medicine and food are brought," Kochavi told Israel Radio. "For a reason that is not clear to us, [the terrorists] are making every effort to destroy our every attempt to allow the Palestinians, their own people, [to lead] easier lives."


Now why would the terrorist be trying to make things harder on their own people?

I thought fighting a war was all about making things easier. No accounting for the Palistinian mind.

Thursday, January 13, 2005

I am not being paid

There seems to be a big scandal going on about commentators and bloggers being paid to flack for campaigns or government programs. We have commentary disguised as journalism in the drug war. In the No Child Left behind Program. Then we have various bloggers being paid by some political campaigns.

At the current time no one is paying me anything for anything. Nada. Zip.

If someone would like to correct that problem you know where to contact me.

I'm for sale. Well for rent at least. Make me an offer.

The Brown Acid - Quality Control in A Free Market

Denis Hamill at the New York Daily News takes drug manufacturers to task about how their products are killing Americans for the sake of company profits.

In 1969, as a hippie kid at Woodstock, I sat in the mud with a score of Brooklyn pilgrims from Prospect Park's Hippie Hill listening to festival organizers shouting over the loudspeakers to the 400,000 zonked-out druggies, "Beware of the brown acid, man! If you've dropped the bad brown acid, report immediately to the medical tent, man!"

And the stampede was on.

Judging by recent events, you get more truth from drug culture than pharmaceutical companies and the Food and Drug Administration.
He goes on to point out that:
On three separate holiday-related occasions, I was sitting around gabbing with friends in Brooklyn and Queens and one of the first topics to arise was the reluctant revelations by the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies that they are literally killing us by the tens of thousands with these deadly prescription drugs they are hawking with less conscience than streetcorner dope pushers.

One young woman had taken Accutane, which we now learn may cause liver damage and birth defects as well as promoting suicide. But, hey, it gets rid of acne!

I spoke with one guy who has been on Prozac for years for his depression, only to learn that Prozac promotes violence toward others and suicidal tendencies - an anti-depressant that sends people to roof ledges to ask, "To be or not to be?"

Eli Lilly and Co. had data to this effect for 15 pill-pushing years, told the FDA, and they both kept it as secret as the books of a Colombian cocaine cartel.
I make a similar point in my article Addiction or Self Medication.
"Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize an undercover dictatorship. To restrict the art of healing to one class of men, and deny equal privilege to others, will be to constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic, and have no place in a Republic. The Constitution of this Republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom." abridged quote --Benjamin Rush, M.D., a signer of the Declaration of Independence
I go on in that article to say just why the "ethical" drug companies are in the lead in the fight against street drugs.
Natural molecules similar to an active ingredient in marijuana play a part in helping the brain clear fearful memories and keep them from being permanently debilitating. The British journal Nature has reported this discovery by scientists at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich, Germany. The scientists of the Institute say that this has implications for the treatment of post traumatic stress disorder and other fear based conditions.

It turns out that anxiety disorders are the most common mental health problem in the United States. They are worth $46 billion a year to the pharmaceutical industry. You don't suppose this fact has any thing to do with the pharmaceutical industries being in the forefront of the Drug Free America campaign do you? Of course not. They are just trying to keep you from being addicted to natural products at the cost of 1/10th of a cent per dose when they are more than willing to sell you an FDA and doctor approved, pharmacy sold product that will do the job for a dollar a dose. They have only your best interests at heart. Just ask their accountants.
There is no doubt that we need an honest robust drug industry. They may through their research have the keys to extending life and reducing suffering. Without honest profits they can not do the research that keeps the pipeline for new medicines full. What is lacking is honest profits. In fact the FDA was invented by the Federal Government to keep the drug companies honest. It hasn't worked out that way. It seems that every Federal regulatory agency eventually gets taken over by the very people it is intended to regulate. See the history of the ICC (The Interstate Commerce Commission) which is fortunately no longer a factor in regulating transportation rates. The same needs to be done to the FDA. What is needed is a private watchdog like UL (for electrical equipment) which came into being around the same time as the FDA. They also regulate a market. The market for electrical equipment. It has worked out rather well with no laws needed and no Federal Regulatory Bureau subject to political pressure. Funny thing is that the UL is a creature beholden to insurance companies.

The free market in action.

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

Want to Fix the Democrat Party?

Here is your chance:

Calling all Democrats!

We are a group of Democrats from across the country determined to do everything within our power to fix the Democratic Party.

As a first step, we are collecting ideas from December 14th through January 14th. We will take the best 100 ideas and submit it to the new Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairman and to every Democratic U.S. Senator, Member of Congress and Governor.

After another disappointing performance by Democrats, it's time to act. It's time for us to stand up and fix this party. Stand up and give us your ideas to fix the Democratic Party.
I'd suggest they drop socialism. And figure out how to help the Iraqi Democracy experiment. What are the odds that those ideas will wind up any where but the trash bin?

LGF fixes

For all you Little Green Football fans: as you know the site is down.

You can still get your fixes here:

Discarded Lies.

Monday, January 10, 2005

Over in Moonbat Land

Well some people just love watching a train wreck. I love watching DU.

And what do the good people at DU have to say about the CBS report on Rathergate?

Evidently there is a lot of learned helplesness going on over there

by tridim Mon Jan-10-05 03:45 PM

Well it's official, apparently CBS made up the entire Bush NG story

I've heard several newsbreaks on a few different radio stations (even AAR), and they all say that the story was and is discredited. The docs were fake and the content was fake. CBS apparently made it all up.

Rove: 1 - Truth: 0

I'm fuming mad right now. They were just busted for bribing Armstrong Williams with tax dollars, yet they still have the gall to close this story out with a mammoth lie. Sigh, I guess it's nothing new. I feel so helpless.
So he thinks the story that once was true is now being branded a lie. I am not sure what makes him feel so helpless. The truth or the fact that his beliefs are not being confirmed. Well he is a denizen of DU (1000+ posts). It could be both.

And then we have the timing is everything crowd. Why is this coming out now? The DU folks have an answer.
by itcfish1 Mon Jan-10-05 04:54 PM

17. Funny This Coming Out Now

When the Armstrong Williams story was growing legs.
CBS held on to this story and then released it just when it could help the Republicans the most. Uh. Huh. It coulda happened that way. Maybe an investigation is needed. LOL.

Ya see it is all the fault of the Republican TV networks. I got proof. Well maybe not proof. I do have a statement:
by TheGoldenRule Mon Jan-10-05 05:40 PM

18. This pisses me off!

Time to let CBS and all the other repuke networks that they've lost a viewer-though actually, I gave up on them all right after the election.

I hope everyone takes the time to do the same!
So there you have it. A Republican plot by the Republican media. Who writes their jokes? It is not a joke? Coulda fooled me.
by mbee Mon Jan-10-05 06:02 PM

21. Hey, it's not their fault since they are not allowed to actually

do investigative journalism. It's against pug law.
Let me see here. The investigation turns up inconvenient facts and it is not investigative journalism. Geeze. I had never looked at it that way before. Probably because I was dropped on my head as a kid. Or the whole lot of them were. Hard to imagine so many clumsy parents. Hard to imagine so many brain damaged kids. Maybe it was the brown acid. Or perhaps there are contacts missing. Like with reality.


--==--

Welcome Instapundit readers

Welcome DU fans.

BTW I was a Communist once long ago and far away. Hard to believe I know.

A regional disaster in another place, another time

This is a three hanky read.

America hasn't changed much in 50+ years. And it is a good thing.

Why an Aircraft Carrier?

Sgt Stryker alerted me to this:

Today, during an afternoon conference that wrapped up my project of the last 18 months, one of my Euro collegues tossed this little turd out to no one in particular:

" See, this is why George Bush is so dumb, theres a disaster in the world and he sends an Aircraft Carrier..."

After which he and many of my Euro collegues laughed out loud.

and then they looked at me. I wasn't laughing, and neither was my Hindi friend sitting next to me, who has lost family in the disaster.

I'm afraid I was "unprofessional", I let it loose -

"Hmmm, let's see, what would be the ideal ship to send to a disaster, now what kind of ship would we want?

Something with its own inexhuastible power supply?

Something that can produce 900,000 gallons of fresh water a day from sea water?

Something with its own airfield? So that after producing the fresh water, it could help distribute it?

Something with 4 hospitals and lots of open space for emergency supplies?

Something with a global communications facility to make the coordination of disaster relief in the region easier?

Well "Franz", us peasants in America call that kind of ship an "Aircraft Carrier". We have 12 of them. How many do you have? Oh that's right, NONE. Lucky for you and the rest of the world, we are the kind of people who share. Even with people we dont like. In fact, if memory serves,once upon a time we peasants spent a ton of money and lives rescuing people who we had once tried to kill and who tried to kill us.
There is way more here. You should go and read it all. For it is good.

Welcome Instapundit readers.

A Nimitz Class Carriercan produce 400,000 gallons of fresh water a day. Of course the whole battle group together could produce more. However, this additional capability would not be used for emergency relief except in the direst of circumstances because unlike the carrier which produces the water from nuclear power the rest of the vessels in the task group would have to use fuel oil burned in the boilers to make fresh water. That means naval oil tankers would be required to make more frequent visits to the fleet for refueling. Refueling also means shutting down just about all other deck activity. Not good when getting food and water to those stranded on shore is critical.

I served as a reactor operator on the Bainbridge (DLG(N)-25). Because of nuclear power we could take just about unlimited fresh water showers. Unheard of in the Navy. Fuel oil is expensive and ship captains are graded on fuel economy. Not so important on a nuclear powered ship. No doubt in this emergency the use by ships company of fresh water is probably way down.

Sunday, January 09, 2005

Kerry Talks to the Troops

Kerry talks to the troops in Iraq. More like the troops talk to Kerry. Here is the message they gave him to take back to Congress.

Kerry also asked soldiers what he should tell Congress about the war in Iraq and was told that "the good work that they are doing is not getting reported in the United States."
I had read this earlier in the day and couldn't remember where I had originally read it. So I went looking on Google news. I looked at six or seven stories about Kerry and the troops and couldn't find it. Do you suppose the MSM is hiding what the troops really want from the American people? Evidently it is not more personal armor or armor for their vehicles. I wonder why this is not being covered in the American press?

Via Kesher Talk.

Busting the Carnival Line - Jam Cruise 3

Carnival Lines was hosting a cruise called Jam Cruise 3.

At the end of the cruise were drug sniffing dogs. Customer service at its finest. Ya gotta wonder whose bright idea that was. It is possible the government thought it up on its own. It coulda happened.

Well they found six people with drugs on their person. Excellent.

Pot, Xtacy, Cocaine. All were charged with felony possesion.

I wonder if there will be a Jam Cruise 4?

I wonder what the mandatory sentence is for felony pot possesion?

I wonder if they found any terrorists? Probably not their job. More's the pity.

Drug Money

Triticale who is an old friend of mine from my days on Sheffield Ave. (a block up from Armitage) in Chicago. And the CACHE Club. Has a really neat comment on a post of mine.

As for the contribution of drug users to the development of computers? Bill Gates has confirmed the rumor that he got into an argument with a table while tripping at the Microsoft offices. Nolan Bushnell has confirmed that Atari corporate design meetings were intense smokefests. The initial Macintosh project was notorious not for the fact of marijuana use but the amount and openness of it. Bob Widlar, the single most influential designer of analog amplifier chips, altho better known for his drinking, liked to go to Acapulco to binge on the famous gold after every breakthru.
There is more. Go read it for it is good.

Saturday, January 08, 2005

The Vulture Elite

The Diplomad is ranting. About the UN. He calls them the High Preist Vulture Elite.

He stars out:

The Chief Diplomad is just back from the office. It's 4 am. Mosquitoes are everywhere. The internet is painfully slow. Your "friendly" Chief Diplomad's plan to move on to another set of duties, for now, has fallen by the roadside. He must remain in the current job for now. The local Guardian correspondent has called the Embassy; he is doing a negative story on the US relief effort based on "information" provided by the UN at a press conference. The Diplomad is in a dark, dark mood. So, of course, just as anyone else would do in such circumstances, The Diplomad writes about the UN.
But that is just a warm up. A bit further on he gets rolling:
Seeing these UNocrats perched at the table, whispering to each other, back-slapping, shaking hands, they seemed like a periodic reunion of old cynical Mafia chieftains or mercenaries who run into each other in different hot spots, as they move from one slaughter to another, "How are you? Haven't seen you since Bosnia . . .." As the hours wore on, however, and I nervously doodled in my note pad, shifted in my chair, looked at my watch, and thought about all the real work I had to do that evening, I decided that, no, labeling them mafiosos or mercenaries was much too kind. They seemed more to be the progeny resulting from a mating between a mad oracle and a giant carrion-eater. They were akin to some sort of ancient mythical Greco-Roman-Aztec-Wes Craven-Egyptian-bird-god that demands constant sacrifice and feeding, and speaks in riddles which only it can solve. Yes, I decided, the UNocrats are great hideous vultures, roused from their caves in the European Alps and in the cement canyons and peaks of Manhattan by the stench of death in the Turd World. They leisurely take flight toward the smell of death; circle, and then swoop down, screeching UNintelligble nonsense. They arrive and immediately force others, e.g., the American tax payer, to build them new exclusive nests in the midst of poverty, and make themselves fat on the flesh of the dead. My friends, allow The Diplomad to present to you The High Priest Vulture Elite (HPVE).

These genuinely repulsive, arrogant creatures survive only because the world's rich countries, the non-Turd World, allow them, too. We in the First World find it politically impossible to reveal their pronouncements as the cant they are. For many in Europe and among the New York Times crowd, helping maintain these mad vultures substitutes for genuine action, "The UN is on the job!" In addition, for many senior bureaucrats and minor politicians, there is always the hope that if they play the game right, they, too, can join the High Priest Vulture Elite: We see the ranks of the HPVE full of Scandinavians and leftist Americans, and the occasional pompous Euro-Brazilian, all of whom parlayed mediocre domestic careers of lip-biting humanitarian symbolism into well-paying tax-free sinecures in the HPVE.
It gets better.

Go read the whole thing. This is an order. I expect a salute followed by action. I expect a report on completion of the assignment. That is all. Carry on.

Friday, January 07, 2005

Appeasement - the Euro disease

Front Page has an article by Matthias Dopfner who is the Chief Executive of German publisher Axel Springer AG on the Euro disease.

He starts out with:

A few days ago Henryk M. Broder wrote in Welt am Sonntag, "Europe -- your family name is appeasement." It's a phrase you can't get out of your head because it's so terribly true.
He goes on to point out how WW2 started and its cost the the Europeans and especially to the Jews. Then he comes forward to today:
Rather than protecting democracy in the Middle East, European appeasement, camouflaged behind the fuzzy word "equidistance," now countenances suicide bombings in Israel by fundamentalist Palestinians. Appeasement generates a mentality that allows Europe to ignore 300,000 victims of Saddam's torture and murder machinery and, motivated by the self-righteousness of the peace-movement, to issue bad grades to George Bush. A particularly grotesque form of appeasement is reacting to the escalating violence by Islamic fundamentalists in Holland and elsewhere by suggesting that we should really have a Muslim holiday in Germany.

What else has to happen before the European public and its political leadership get it? There is a sort of crusade underway, an especially perfidious crusade consisting of systematic attacks by fanatic Muslims, focused on civilians and directed against our free, open Western societies. It is a conflict that will most likely last longer than the great military conflicts of the last century -- a conflict conducted by an enemy that cannot be tamed by tolerance and accommodation but only spurred on by such gestures, which will be mistaken for signs of weakness.


He has more. Go and read.

Chicken Crossing

Another fine one from Faust.

Why Did the Chicken cross the Road?

Coalition Provisional Authority: The fact that the Iraqi chicken crossed the road affirmatively demonstrates that decision-making authority has been transferred to the chicken well in advance of the scheduled June 30th transition of power. From now on the chicken is responsible for its own decisions.

Halliburton: We were asked to help the chicken cross the road. Given the inherent risk of road crossing and the rarity of chickens, this operation will only cost the US government $326,004.

Muqtada al-Sadr: The chicken was a tool of the evil Coalition and will be killed.

US Army Military Police: We were directed to prepare the chicken to cross the road. As part of these preparations, individual soldiers ran over the chicken repeatedly and then plucked the chicken. We deeply regret the occurrence of any chicken rights violations.

Peshmerga: The chicken crossed the road, and will continue to cross the road, to show its independence and to transport the weapons it needs to defend itself. However, in future, to avoid problems, the chicken will be called a duck, and will wear a plastic bill.

1st Cav: The chicken was not authorized to cross the road without displaying two forms of picture identification. Thus, the chicken was appropriately detained and searched in accordance with current SOP?s. We apologize for any embarrassment to the chicken. As a result of this unfortunate incident, the command has instituted a gender sensitivity training program and all future chicken searches will be conducted by female soldiers.

Al Jazeera: The chicken was forced to cross the road multiple times at gunpoint by a large group of occupation soldiers, according to eye-witnesses. The chicken was then fired upon intentionally, in yet another example of the abuse of innocent Iraqi chickens.

Blackwater: We cannot confirm any involvement in the chicken-road-crossing incident.

Translators: Chicken he cross street because bad she tangle regulation. Future chicken table against my request.

U.S. Marine Corps: The chicken is dead.

Navy: The chicken upon crossing the road was painted and lashed to the curb.

Kerry: "The chicken crossed the road before it did not"

Baghdad Bob: The chicken never crossed the road! He is safe in Baghdad, miles from the marauding vehicles of the infidel! THERE IS NO ROAD!

USAF: "As you can see here in the target video, the bomb was locked onto the chicken...and there it goes...the chicken is still moving...still moving...and unfortunately passed out of the parameters of the guidance system so that the bomb completely missed it and hit the weasel instead. Gotta admit thought, it's impressive footage..."

Uncle Faust is Telling Jokes

My friend Faust is telling military jokes over at the Al Bawaba Forum. He is in fine form.

Here is a good one. Go and read the rest.

The teacher gave her fifth grade class an assignment: get their parents to tell them a story with a moral at the end of it. The next day the kids came back and one by one began to tell their stories.

Kathy said, "My father's a farmer and we have a lot of egg-laying hens. One time we were taking our eggs to market in a basket an the front seat of the pickup when we hit a bump in the road and the eggs went flying and broke and made a mess."
"And what's the moral of the story?" asked the teacher.

"Don't put all your eggs in one basket!"

"Very good," said the teacher. "Now, Lucy?"

"Our family are farmers too. But we raise chickens for the meat market. We had a dozen eggs one time, but when they hatched we only got ten live chicks. And the moral to this story is, don't count your chickens before they're hatched."

"That's a fine story Lucy," she continued. "Johnny, do you have a story to share?"

"Yes ma'am, my daddy told me this story about my Uncle Faust. Uncle Faust was a Marine in Vietnam and his helicopter got hit. He had to crash land in enemy territory and all he had was a bottle of whiskey, a machine gun and a machete. He drank the whiskey on the way down so it wouldn't break and then he landed right in the middle of 100 enemy troops. He killed seventy with the machine gun until he ran out of bullets, then he killed twenty more with with the machete till the blade broke and then killed the last ten with his bare hands."

"Good heavens," said the teacher, "What kind of moral did your daddy tell you from that horrible story?"

"Don't @!#$ with Uncle Faust when he's been drinking."

I could be wrong

Over at Winds of Change there is a good discussion going on about the relationship of the media dinosaurs and the blogs. Here is my take (also posted in the comments at WoC):

Over at my blog I cover a story that neither the blogs (WoC excepted) nor the MSM (Main Stream Media) is covering.

The true nature of what is commonly refered to as "addiction". I cover the science (much of it new in the last three years). It has a lot to do with how our ideas of right and wrong are formed. What is human nature. What can a man/woman be held accountable for. All based on how the brain works. There is a revolution on the way as this understanding becomes more generally known.

No expert in the field has effectively countered my assertions and some have told me that they think what I have found is central to fixing the problem. A researcher in the field even told me that he used my articles as a basis for suggesting possible profitable lines of further research.

The advantage of blogs is not their right/wrong view. It is the breadth of view points.

Google has helpped a lot with Blogger and the Google search engine. People with an interest in the subject find me.

BTW my central thesis is that what we call "addiction" is actually self medication for PTSD.

What I find most interesting is that a "lefty" came to my site and thanked me for getting the word out. He wondered why I as a "right winger" was championing a cause that is identified as "left".

My simple answer: I follow the truth where ever it leads me.

I'd say that was more true of the "right" blogs than the "left". Ideology can be a blinder. One must always have doubt. Even of one's most cherished beliefs. Such doubt is what moved me from the communist/Democrat view point to the libertarian/right point of view.

So all I can say is: I could be wrong.

Show me.

Thursday, January 06, 2005

A little tact goes a long way

Sports Illustrated has a very nice picture of Marisa Miller.

I showed it to my first mate. She humors me.

Then I told her she looks a lot like that when she wears a bikini (which she never does in public). She told me I was kidding. Then I got a big smile and a hug.

Which just goes to show.

A little tact goes a long way.

Monday, January 03, 2005

Regen Rcvr - 1

My hobby as well as my business is electronics. I'm in the final stages of a project I have been thinking about for 47 years. A regenerative radio. My original design (the design was a school project) was a one tube job with a tickler coil run on batteries.

The latest version (which is actually being built) consists of an RF stage (done - gain of 12 measured), followed by a Colpitts type regenerative stage (a short discussion of the Colpitts Oscilator), and an infinite impedance type detector. The audio is handled by an LM 386 and two minature oval speakers wired in series. The audio stage has been tested (a few minutes ago)and while not disco in volume will hurt your ears up close the response goes to about zero below 100 Hz and above 7 kHz. Good for a short wave reciever.

A schematic which is in part similar to my final design. I have changed some part values (the input cap fer instance is now 270 pF vs 47 pF). Plus I have a heftier audio out stage (the LM386). I have already added input jacks (3.5 mm and 1/4") so I can use it as an audio amp and later I will be adding output jacks for ext speakers or headphones.

The frequency band is going to be a few hundred kHz (or more) centered around WWV at 10 MHz. I have this nice old 75pF variable as the main tuning and a pair of back to back 1N4148's used as varactors (semiconductor capacitors that vary with voltage) for fine tuning. I'm using a 10.7 MHz IF transformer as the interstage coupling (L1 in the schematic at the above url) and tuning coil.

Back when I designed the original tube job adding more tubes for audio power or an RF stage was not very common. Tubes were hot (burn your fingers hot), used high voltages ( 67 1/2 volts and up - 90 volts was very common for portable equipment), and required a watt or two of heater (filament) power for each tube and another watt or so of plate power. Plus they were kind of bulky. The fewer the better. Vacuum tubes, or as my friend Brad Boyer liked to say: "space bottles".

Now my input RF stage (PN2222) uses about 55 milliwatts worst case. (I should rebias it because with a 12 V supply the collector sits at 1.56 volts - but it amplifies well enough in the voltage ranges I expect ( 1 micro volt to 100 millivolts ) that I'm not going to fool with it 'til later.

At full crank (maximum undistorted audio output) the whole radio ought to draw about two to two and a half watts. Average power should be in the range of 1/2 watt or less.

--==--

Here is a regen reciever of the old style with a tickler coil/Armstrong detector. it uses a LM386 for the audio power amp.

Here is a one tube regenerative reciever. and a report by some one who has had such a reciever on his mind for a few decades.

A nice picture of a 1920s commercial regen reciever.

Another nice picture of a 1920s commercial set. It is for sale $650. Way out of my price range. The set I'm building would cost about $30 - $40 for parts if everything was bought new.

Here is the front panel of a modern regen radio.

Another Armstrong type detector.

Here is a Hartley feedback regen schematic. The schematic is poor but you can get the general idea. Construction details here. Here is the original ARRL article (PDF) by Kitchin. The design shown covers around 7 MHz (40 Meters) and with a switch 3.5 MHz (80 Meters)

Another old time commercial regen set.

More neat pictures and a book on building a regen. I haven't read the book so I can't comment on the quality. The review looks good (don't they always?).

Here is a regenerative radio with a design (electronically) very similar to the one I designed 40+ years ago.

This is a two tube job (audio amplification) again with a regen stage similar to my 40+ year old design.

Here is a page that has a nice circuit for a ham band (about 7.0 to 7.5 MHz) regen. He also explains from an operational view point all the pluses and minuses of a regen. He also has an interesting one transistor design. It uses the tuning coil as a loop antenna. Fascinating.

This is a schematic of a sort of super hetrodyne reciever. It is a crystal controlled converter followed by a 3.5 to 4.0 MHz tuneable regenerative IF. Here is an explanation of how the circuit works along with construction details. It is a three tube job. It could easily be transistorized.

--==--

Reported 06:59z 04 Jan 2005.

Well I finally fired up the regen stage - nothing. So I'm thinking what could go wrong? Tis is supposed to be almost fool proof. Well sit back. Have a smoke - THINK. What could it be? The resistors are all 1/4 W jobs with color codes. They are correct. The Colpitts capacitors? Hmmm. 39 pF going to the JFET detector. Fine. 390 pF to the base of the Colpitts regen. Fine. 39,000 from the emitter to ground. BINGO. Replace it with a 390 pF. Oscillation. Outstanding.

Now there is a slight motor boat (low frequency oscillation). Hmmm. There are a few places where some more bypassing might do some good. I'll tack on some caps and report back later.

Updated 11:07z 04 Jan 2005

I tacked 3 or 4 .1 uF monolithic ceramics in likely locations and the motor boating stopped. I also cut the built in capacitor out of the IF can to increase the tuning rnge. I'm going to get the fine tuning pot attached to the board and then I'll solder the main tuning cap to the board and it will be done. A solid mechanical mount for the board will complete the process.

Updated 09:03 06 Jan 2005

I have connected the main tuning capacitor to the board. The reciever now tunes from about 8.7 MHz to 10.4 MHz. I could tweak this a little by adjusting the tuning coil but this is close enough to what I want - Coverage from 9.5 to 10.3 MHz which includes the short wave bands from 9.25 to 9.999 MHz. WWV at 10.000 MHz. And the amateur band from 10.100 to 10.150 MHz.

The fine tuning works but is a little too fine. I think I will mod it by adding diodes in parallel to the ones already installed.

I did change the collector to base resistor from 1 Meg ohm to 2.2 Meg. That raised the collector voltage to about 6 volts out of 9. That should allow signals about 3X those the stage could originally handle.

My first station recieved was a Spanish langusage station on 9.72 MHz (roughly). I did it with three jumper clips connected together. I'm going to add a good ground and some kind of indoor antenna (10 - 15 ft) and see what I can get.

Update: 05:17z 07 Jan 2005

I tacked on another pair of 1N4148 diodes to the pair already on the board and the fine tuning is still too fine. So I decided it was time for heavier ammunition. A 1N4002 rectifier diode ought to have more capacitance as it is rated for 10X the current that a 1N4148 can handle. More current = bigger junction area = more capacitance.

Did it work? Yep. Fine tuning now covers about 100 KHz. I could reduce it some by reducing the voltage to the tuning control but it works OK so I'm leaving it as is.

I have buttoned up the case. Time for a new project.

WWV only comes in well during the day. Even then it fades in and out. Which is to be expected in the short wave bands.

My 13 year daugghter played with it today. She thought it was fun. She likes the more modern jobs with digital dials better.

My first mate keeps asking if I can get Europe. I tried to explain that there has to be a European station transmitting on a frequency I can recieve. This did not satisfy her. She said that I needed to find a short wave listing on the net and get some Europe. She must be right. (Tact again).

--==--

Dave Halliday has a nice review of this project.

--==--

BTW. Any one interested in getting help on a radio project - leave a comment or send an e-mail.


I'll add to this as I progress. Probably in new posts once this moves down the page.

Gen X bitching

I was reading some interesting war stuff and came across a post by some Gen Xers. You know - the usual whine. The "Greatest Generation" screwed us. The "Boomers" screwed us. And now it is up to the morally purified Xers to clean up the mess. Well you know - gag me with a spoon - to quote the infamous Moon Unit Zappa.

Here is my response starting with the usual drug thingy rant:

LSD was a product of the "Greatest Generation". Albert Hoffman invented it in WW2 in Switzerland. Its first major use was by the CIA in the MK Ultra program. They liked giving it to people and then taping them having sex. Way cool for a government program no?

As to "Free Love" - you guys are just jealous.

And then we have Monica. My kind of girl. Zaftig. Well any way we have a Republican Congress spending about two years wagging the dick and every time ole Billy Boy said Osama the Republicans said: "Wag the Dog". I don't see who comes out the worse in that little political entertainment but I did get to say "blow job" and "cum stained" out loud at work without getting accused of sexual harrasment. I count that as a plus.

BTW for what it is worth I voted for Bush. But only because Larry Flynt wasn't running.

Oh. Yeah. Drugs. We are finding that people self medicate for PTSD by chronically taking drugs. It will come out in time that the biggest cause of drug abuse is PTSD induced by child abuse. The #2 cause these days will be the War. Which I support. (Iran soon - please).

BTW my kids like music from the 60s - it is about 1/2 of what they listen to. You might consider getting some of your gen. musically trained.

And then there is this internet thingy. Brought to you by boomers. About 1/2 of which at the time ('75 to '79) where hacking up a storm (when hacking was still a good thing) while doing copious quantities of pot and other drugs.

In fact some day when the real history of Silicon Valley is written we will find out that much of the early entreprenureal efforts were underwritten by illegal drug money.

Did I mention that the #2 of Microsoft from that era used to post copiously in the Drugs news group? Or the Jobs-Wozniak collaboration - they sold a VW Microbus to finance the first Apples. In that day and age who owned VW busses? Begins with an "h".

Well any way.

You ought to quit yer bitchin have some serious fun and DO SOMETHING.

Sex, Drugs, Rock 'n Roll. And the internet. Not a bad legacy.
Then he says that abortion is a terrible legacy. Well you know I have something to say about that too:
How to stop drugs:

Drug police.

How to stop abortion:

Vagina police.

I want to be an Inspector.

M'Kay?
I think I have punished the Xers enough for one day.

Sunday, January 02, 2005

Good news from Iraq - Voting edition

Iraq the Model has some very good news about voting in Iraq.

The electoral campaigns are heating up in Iraq and the elections are occupying greater portion of the Iraqis' thinking.

Many people keep asking me about how broad is the Iraqis' interest in the elections? What's the expected percentage of participation in the upcoming elections? As the vision for the world regarding these issues is still blurred, so I'd like to clarify few related points:

First of all, lots of people and parties try to speak on behalf of Iraqis and I tell them "we're capable of expressing ourselves and no one can play this role other than Iraqis themselves".

The situation here indicates that a great percentage of Iraqis are WITH the elections and are looking forward to participate in the process and truly I don't know why the media insists on showing the voices that oppose the elections that represent parties swimming against the majority's current and chose violence and terror as a way to deal with the people and this is a striking evidence for their failure because if they were representing the general will of the people we would've seen peaceful activities in which the sons of Iraq take part, the thing that didn't happen because Iraqis are certain that the elections fall into the interest of the whole population (except of course for the terrorists and the remnants of the dead regime).

Iraqis' response to terror was so clear; after the terrorists, or the so called insurgents threatened to slaughter anyone who participates in the elections, 7200 Iraqis rushed to announce their candidacy. YES, 7200 Iraqis representing more than 200 different political parties and I believe this makes the image clearer for the viewer.


There is lots more. Follow the link.

Saturday, January 01, 2005

Happy 2005

It is now New Years in the Midwest.

More and Better