Friday, November 06, 2009

Muslim Jihadist Infiltrators

Resist Net has this from Walid Shoebat a former jihadist.


In the wake of the cowardly Ft. Hoot mass fatal shooting of 11 or more unarmed U.S. soldiers by Maj. Malik Nadal Hasan, America has the right to know the truth about sleeper war cells in the U.S.

Walid Shoebat Former Islamic Terrorist who was once part of Jihad war cells in the US and understands fully the mindset of terrorists has been warning America of the potential of this very type of tragedy and worse for many years.

Shoebat contends that the US Army, Navy, Air Force, FBI, CIA, Dept. of Homeland Security are all infiltrated with Muslim Extremists.

“America needs to awaken from its sleep and its unwillingness to face the issue of fundamentalist Islam in our midst which undoubtedly is the cause of the tragedy in Ft Hood” says Mr. Shoebat, adding, “Some very serious decisions need to made when it comes to having Muslims protecting our country, as it is impossible to know whether they maybe honorable or foxes in the hen house.”

Walid is the author of the book Why We Want to Kill You: The Jihadist Mindset and How to Defeat It

By Walid Shoebat:

-- Nidal Malik Hasan is NOT a convert but Jordanian Muslim SINCE BIRTH! Infiltration by Islamists in the military is a fact My own brother served in the United States Air Force and his loyalty was to his ideology, yet allowing him to guard nuclear facilities should be on check. Religion is a sensitive issue but we should not undermine our security from fear of ‘Islamophobia.’

-- Muslims by Sharia Law are mandated never to fight Muslims. Muslim soldiers need to be questioned whether this is an issue, yet we virtually never question them.

-- Converts to Islam are susceptible to Islamization, the case of Sgt. Hassan Akbar from Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait killed two Americans and was influenced by the MSU (Muslim Student Association), also Ali Muhammad a double agent that worked for the FBI and collaborated with Al-Qaeda

-- Speaking at the Air Force Academy in Colorado to expose the infiltration of Islamist. Not only were over a hundred of Middle Eastern Muslims allowed to infiltrate, but were also allowed to threaten us with death with no repercussions whatsoever -- Omar Khalifa, a student, got away with the threats and while Khalifa was related to Osama Bin Laden's son-in-law, he was largely ignored!

-- At the Marines, our event was cancelled as to ‘not to offend Saudi visitors. At Camp Bullis was a Muslim in the U.S army who said he was ‘offended’ that I spoke on the issue of terrorism. Has ‘Political correctness’ seeped into our military apparatus to the point where no one can say anything lest they risk we offend someone? When Americans are being killed,all issues should be on the table.

-- The big question: Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome or Terrorism?
Nidal never served in Iraq or Afghanistan to qualify as a candidate for Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.
First off. I'm one of the few, the proud, the Jews. Heh. Also US Navy. Yank them rods. (Nuke qualified a very long time ago)

I have posting privileges at Muslims Against Sharia.

So what do I think? We need to carefully differentiate between those Muslims who want to be Americans and those who don't.

Eric at Classical Values has this to say about Hassan's imam:
Hasan's imam Faizul Khan is no ordinary imam. He is on the Board of Directors of the ISNA, a radical Wahhabi outfit which "enforces extremist Wahhabi theological writ in America's mosques."
So that is one way to tell. The Whabists need to be expelled from America. Whether they are native born or foreign born.

Radical Islam is not a religion. It is a traitorous political party masquerading as a religion and should be treated as such.

Cross Posted at Classical Values


simentt said...

Dear Sir,

You write;
We need to carefully differentiate between those Muslims who want to be Americans and those who don't.

Shouldn't this rather be
We need to carefully differentiate between those who more want to be Muslims than Americans, and those who more want to be Americans than Muslims.

I see this as a personal identity issue, and believe that any one who identifies more strongly with one group, by necessity will identify less strongly with other groups.

Thus a person of Muslim faith who primarily sees himself as an American won't have the same loyalties of a person with an American passport who primarily sees himself as a Muslim.


M. Simon said...

What I have proposed of course is unconstitutional for American citizens. Probably a heat of the moment thing. I let my outrage overcome my misgivings. And I had some when I wrote this.

You might like to enter the discussion of that question here:

America and Islam

Tom Cuddihy said...

simentt and msimon
I'm afraid you are both making the mistake of thinking that one can distinguish between good and bad American Muslims. The unpleasant reality that is emerging is that the only distinction that really matters is that between devout and dissident Muslims.
Every devout Muslim, properly educated in their 'faith,' is required to commit jihad in the service of Islam. They are essentially all ticking timebombs, either of passive support for, or in the most serious, active acts of terrorism.

Wahabism is not a modern invention but only a modern symptom of a 1300 year old disease.

Until we realize that and take steps accordingly, we will never be free of jihadi terror.

Tom Cuddihy said...

The point that didn't make it into my last comment is not that all Muslims are faithful jihadists (far from it), but that there are plenty of dissident Muslims (by surveys apparently a silent majority of Muslims) who do not agree with the need for jihad--however, the fact is those folks are, by nature of Koranic chapter and verse, not devout Muslims because jihad is one of the seven required pillars of Islam and it is overwhelmingly understood to be violent jihad.

M. Simon said...

Good point Tom.