Solid State Radio
My latest article on the revival of crystal radios can be read at Solid State Radio. It is a treasure trove of links and nostalgia for those interested in crystal radios.
Cross Posted at Classical Values
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
2 comments:
IS VERMONT A "SOLID STATE"?
THE RUSSIANS ARE IN AN UPROAR ABOUT
POSSIBLE VOTE COUNT FRAUD.
WHY IS THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE U.S.A.
SO WELL TRAINED THAT THEY DO NOT
MENTION THE VOTE COUNT FRAUD IN
THE U.S.A.?
WILL THE VOTE FRAUD OF 2010 IN VERMONT
HAPPEN AGAIN IN 2012?
There are allegations
in the news today, Dec. 6, 2011, that some people in Russia are
concerned about vote count fraud there.
Is Vermont really all that "far away" from Russia?
How does vote fraud effect our economy? Is the richest
and wealthiest candidate the one who will win;
and win over the justice system as well?
"Governor" Peter Shumlin of Vermont,
a Democrat, allegedly is a "fraud".
Thousands of votes were allegedly stolen from candidate Cris Ericson,
which you can see by the difference in the unofficial election results
collected, and then the official results released to the news media.
Once the unofficial results were tabulated, it was clear that no candidate
had received a majority of the vote.
Under Vermont law, when that happens, the full state legislative body
must vote on a ballot with the names of the three candidates who
received the most votes.
By changing the vote count, instead of Cris Ericson's
(United States Marijuana Party http://usmjp.com )
name being on that ballot,
Dennis Steele's name was listed.
If Cris Ericson's name (United States Marijuana Party
http://USMJP.com ) had been listed, then some of the state legislators
may have voted for her, and that may have changed the outcome,
giving the most votes for Governor to the Republican candidate, Brian Dubie.
Cris Ericson (United States Marijuana Party http://USMJP.com )
would not have won, but by allegedly stealing votes from
her, and not putting her name on the ballot the full state legislative
body was required to vote on because no candidate received a
majority of the vote, the correct outcome is unknown.
Unless the stolen votes are recovered by finding out who may have
hacked into the system, who may have been paid off, and who may
be guilty of alleged voter fraud,
it is not appropriate or legally correct allegedly, for Peter Shumlin to
act as Governor of Vermont.
The person or persons who allegedly committed this voter fraud
should be discovered and then the full state legislature should
be required to vote again for Governor because no candidate
received a majority of the vote, and the vote that was taken
by the state legislative body was allegedly based on voter fraud.
Just look at the difference in the two vote counts from unofficial,
when someone realized no candidate had a majority of the vote,
to the official results which give an allegedly weaker candidate the third place.
Unofficial election results:
http://vermont-elections.org/elections1/2010GEUnofficialFedStateResults11.05.xls
"Official" election results released to the News Media:
http://vermont-elections.org/elections1/2010GEOfficialFedStateResults11.09.xls
Deborah Markowitz (Democrat) was Secretary of State at the time and in control, and
therefore she allegedly should be charged with vote fraud.
Peter Shumlin allegedly rewarded Deborah Markowitz for her alleged
vote fraud by giving her an extremely high paying job in his administration,
which she now holds.
Are Peter Shumlin and Deborah Markowitz criminals, and if so,
under what federal codes and statutes?
What on earth is the difference between Rod Blagojevich's crimes, and Peter Shumlin rewarding Deborah Markowitz?
IS VERMONT A "SOLID STATE"?
THE RUSSIANS ARE IN AN UPROAR ABOUT
POSSIBLE VOTE COUNT FRAUD.
WHY IS THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE U.S.A.
SO WELL TRAINED THAT THEY DO NOT
MENTION THE VOTE COUNT FRAUD IN
THE U.S.A.?
WILL THE VOTE FRAUD OF 2010 IN VERMONT
HAPPEN AGAIN IN 2012?
There are allegations
in the news today, Dec. 6, 2011, that some people in Russia are
concerned about vote count fraud there.
Is Vermont really all that "far away" from Russia?
How does vote fraud effect our economy? Is the richest
and wealthiest candidate the one who will win;
and win over the justice system as well?
"Governor" Peter Shumlin of Vermont,
a Democrat, allegedly is a "fraud".
Thousands of votes were allegedly stolen from candidate Cris Ericson,
which you can see by the difference in the unofficial election results
collected, and then the official results released to the news media.
Once the unofficial results were tabulated, it was clear that no candidate
had received a majority of the vote.
Under Vermont law, when that happens, the full state legislative body
must vote on a ballot with the names of the three candidates who
received the most votes.
By changing the vote count, instead of Cris Ericson's
(United States Marijuana Party http://usmjp.com )
name being on that ballot,
Dennis Steele's name was listed.
If Cris Ericson's name (United States Marijuana Party
http://USMJP.com ) had been listed, then some of the state legislators
may have voted for her, and that may have changed the outcome,
giving the most votes for Governor to the Republican candidate, Brian Dubie.
Cris Ericson (United States Marijuana Party http://USMJP.com )
would not have won, but by allegedly stealing votes from
her, and not putting her name on the ballot the full state legislative
body was required to vote on because no candidate received a
majority of the vote, the correct outcome is unknown.
Unless the stolen votes are recovered by finding out who may have
hacked into the system, who may have been paid off, and who may
be guilty of alleged voter fraud,
it is not appropriate or legally correct allegedly, for Peter Shumlin to
act as Governor of Vermont.
The person or persons who allegedly committed this voter fraud
should be discovered and then the full state legislature should
be required to vote again for Governor because no candidate
received a majority of the vote, and the vote that was taken
by the state legislative body was allegedly based on voter fraud.
Just look at the difference in the two vote counts from unofficial,
when someone realized no candidate had a majority of the vote,
to the official results which give an allegedly weaker candidate the third place.
Unofficial election results:
http://vermont-elections.org/elections1/2010GEUnofficialFedStateResults11.05.xls
"Official" election results released to the News Media:
http://vermont-elections.org/elections1/2010GEOfficialFedStateResults11.09.xls
Deborah Markowitz (Democrat) was Secretary of State at the time and in control, and
therefore she allegedly should be charged with vote fraud.
Peter Shumlin allegedly rewarded Deborah Markowitz for her alleged
vote fraud by giving her an extremely high paying job in his administration,
which she now holds.
Are Peter Shumlin and Deborah Markowitz criminals, and if so,
under what federal codes and statutes?
What on earth is the difference between Rod Blagojevich's crimes, and Peter Shumlin rewarding Deborah Markowitz?
Post a Comment