Tuesday, October 26, 2004

The UN wants a Kerry Win - badly

Today Yahoo has a story on 380 tons of missing Iraqi explosives. Evidently they have been sitting on this story for 18 months.

No mention of the 100,000 tons of explosives and ordinance already destroyed. Or the 200,000+ tons awaiting destruction. [Correction on these numbers from the CNN/NBC link below. Ereli said coalition forces have cleared 10,033 weapons caches and destroyed 243,000 tons of munitions. Another 162,898 tons of munitions are at secure locations and awaiting destruction, he said.]

Ah. But tthe explosives may have been gone before American troops arrived:

from Drudge:

An NBCNEWS crew embedded with troops moved in to secure the Al-Qaqaa weapons facility on April 10, 2003, one day after the liberation of Iraq.

According to NBCNEWS, the HMX and RDX explosives were already missing when the American troops arrived.

"The U.S. Army was at the site one day after the liberation and the weapons were already gone," a top Republican blasted from Washington late Monday.

The International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors last saw the explosives in January 2003 when they took an inventory and placed fresh seals on the bunkers.

Dem vp hopeful John Edwards blasted Bush for not securing the explosives: "It is reckless and irresponsible to fail to protect and safeguard one of the largest weapons sites in the country. And by either ignoring these mistakes or being clueless about them, George Bush has failed. He has failed as our commander in chief; he has failed as president."

A senior Bush official e-mailed DRUDGE late Monday: "Let me get this straight, are Mr. Kerry and Mr. Edwards now saying we did not go into Iraq soon enough? We should have invaded and liberated Iraq sooner?"

Top Kerry adviser Joe Lockhart fired back Monday night: "In a shameless attempt to cover up its failure to secure 380 tons of highly explosive material in Iraq, the White House is desperately flailing in an effort to escape blame. Instead of distorting John Kerry’s words, the Bush campaign is now falsely and deliberately twisting the reports of journalists. It is the latest pathetic excuse from an administration that never admits a mistake, no matter how disastrous."

Why is the U.N. nuclear agency suddenly warning now that insurgents in Iraq may have obtained nearly 400 tons of missing explosives -- in early 2003?

NBCNEWS Jim Miklaszewski quoted one official: "Recent disagreements between the administration and the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency makes this announcement appear highly political."
CNN is now reporting the NBC story.
Tuesday, October 26, 2004 Posted: 3:01 AM EDT (0701 GMT)
(CNN) -- The mystery surrounding the disappearance of 380 tons of powerful explosives from a storage depot in Iraq has taken a new twist, after a network embedded with the U.S. military during the invasion of Iraq reported that the material had already vanished by the time American troops arrived.
The Main Stream Media is now debunking pro-Kerry stories almost in real time. I'd say the Kerry camp is desperate. Running with so many unverified stories.

Bush must be way up for Kerry to be so intemperate.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Today on Fox News Special Report, Mort Kondracke said that the IAEA did not inform the US until May 2003 that these explosives were missing.

Why didn't they inform us before we went in since they were the agency in control of this military site?

Anonymous said...

"Evidently they have been sitting on this story for 18 months."

Based on what? Do you have evidence that Reuters knew about this 18 months ago?

"No mention of the 100,000 tons of explosives and ordinance already destroyed. Or the 200,000+ tons awaiting destruction."

You know it's funny how when the Clinton/Lewinsky affair made headlines, not every article pointed out all the time that Clinton had been faithful to his wife? Why wasn't that mentioned in every single article? Because it simply wasn't relevant. Same here.

Also, the explosives that are the subject of this article are not quite the same as the hundreds of thousands of tons that didn't go missing. Go read up on it sometime.

"But tthe explosives may have been gone before American troops arrived"

That attempt at debunking has itself already been debunked. "The U.S. Army was at the site one day after the liberation and the weapons were already gone"... but the U.S. Army didn't search the complex of over a hundred large buildings. So the Republican spin on this is, as they say, now inoperative.

In Bush's own words: "I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations."

"I'd say the Kerry camp is desperate. Running with so many unverified stories."

So the Iraqi government is now part of the Kerry camp? Check the mirror - your delusional paranoia is showing.

"Bush must be way up for Kerry to be so intemperate."

Either that or they're running neck and neck, and Kerry is taking advantage of a potential Bush weakness.

That's how the reality-based community would see it.