tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post7853624453852464368..comments2024-03-19T01:48:39.709+00:00Comments on Power and Control: Prostitution ServicesM. Simonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09508934110558197375noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-55679949739189305502010-01-01T20:04:39.289+00:002010-01-01T20:04:39.289+00:00Samuel,
ALL the models predict a hot spot in the ...Samuel,<br /><br />ALL the models predict a hot spot in the upper atmosphere of the tropics if the globe is warming as the models predict. <br /><br />There is no such hot spot. That tells us there is something wrong with the models. Two possibilities:<br />1. Errors in ALL the models<br />2. Global temperatures are steady or falling. <br /><br />From past history we know that ice ages are not wet but dry. Which you would expect (based on simple understanding - there may be more complex factors at work) because colder air holds less water.<br /><br />Now I agree the transitions should be wetter. So why haven't we seen that? It may be possible (given the likelyhood of cooked data) that we have already passed the transition. <br /><br />OTOH I have heard that the snow pack is building up in California this year - I don't know if that is true. <br /><br />===<br /><br />I would like to see a full audit of data and methods starting with station records, adjustment methods, model parameters, etc. <br /><br />Unfortunately the CRU (whose data is in whole or in part significant in 3 of the 4 temperature records - all except the satellite record - which may be biased from surface station records) has "lost" the original data. Pity. <br /><br />And then there is the lousy surface stations themselves. Look at surfacestations.org for a review of the best in the world. And imagine what 2nd best looks like. Or 14th best. <br /><br />For instance all of South America is represented by 6 or 7 long term records. <br /><br />And the oceans? Worse. Until ARGO.<br /><br />For one thing ships move. So other than islands you don't monitor one point for years as is done for the land record. <br /><br />If the AGW theory is true the best you can say about it is that given what we have to work with it is not proven.<br /><br />And if the Russian Solar guys are right it will be cooling until 2055 or 2060. <br /><br />And don't forget the CLOUD experiments at CERN. They may provide evidence of a mechanism not currently in the models. With an answer coming around 2013 or 2014.<br /><br />Did I mention the PDO which was discovered in 1997 and is only now being included in the models. The PDO has a roughly 60 year cycle. In the warm phase we get warming scares. In the cooling phase ice age scares. And this publicity cycle has been going on since the late 1890s. The PDO went negative around 2005 IIRC. Which means (even if the Russians are wrong) a cooling scare around 2030 or 2035.M. Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09508934110558197375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-60490133626702903532009-12-31T02:48:40.587+00:002009-12-31T02:48:40.587+00:00If the planet is cooling, we should expect to see ...If the planet is cooling, we should expect to see an increase in aggregate precipitation, as the humidity in the atmosphere condenses. Likewise, the frequency of super-cells traversing the oceans should drop.<br /><br />Meanwhile, characteristically rainy seasons here in California go bone-dry in comparison to just two years ago, contradicting the hypothesis that the atmosphere is cooling.<br /><br />Can you point to any sources of precipitation studies to see if precipitation is increasing or if super-cell activity is declining?<br /><br />Thanks.Samuel A. Falvo IIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11523132404727383627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-73284694062152548212009-12-30T05:41:56.803+00:002009-12-30T05:41:56.803+00:00Wow, that was some heavy rhetoric from our residen...Wow, that was some heavy rhetoric from our resident atmospheric physics-poster.<br /><br />Thank you, 99 - I'm sure your attitude is supportive of your goals.<br /><br />Yours,<br />-SUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02161314263975554730noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-51513622839788406742009-12-29T04:10:15.613+00:002009-12-29T04:10:15.613+00:00Hey Linearstinker...
Picking on a PR guy huh? We...Hey Linearstinker...<br /><br />Picking on a PR guy huh? Well, we all know you have the brain capacity of watermelon seed. Go strap yourself to the top of a telephone pole somewhere -- preferably one smack in the middle of a lightning storm.<br /><br />The PR guy can spin your predicament to the insurance folks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-69881671262295425832009-12-27T12:49:55.833+00:002009-12-27T12:49:55.833+00:00I love your attitude Dewy. If data is contrived, i...I love your attitude Dewy. If data is <b>contrived</b>, if results are <b>concocted</b>, if there is evidence of <b>chicanery</b>, etc. you aren't allowed to say so because those are loaded words.<br /><br /><b>Hide The Decline</b><br /><br />When is a spade not a spade? When the truth is inconvenient. <br /><br />Chris,<br /><br />It is not the Higgs Boson you have to worry about. It is the bosun's mate.M. Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09508934110558197375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-50445318311587794082009-12-27T09:53:34.373+00:002009-12-27T09:53:34.373+00:00Dewey Dow, unpaid hack.
30 years in PR. There...Dewey Dow, unpaid hack.<br /><br />30 years in PR. There's an impressive cv for ya.<br /><br />No attempt to define how his list of alleged propaganda terms aren't applicable. Just attack the messenger. <br /><br />Dewey Dow. Should I borrow that name if I want to create a sock puppet for visiting Daily Kos? I smell dirty socks.linearthinkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05201292791445921817noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-66678298190359792752009-12-27T04:18:49.046+00:002009-12-27T04:18:49.046+00:00yeah, I got an e-mail from my Aunt about their sno...yeah, I got an e-mail from my Aunt about their snow their in Dallas, and so referring to my mother's newspaper clipping from January <br />16, 2000 about eh Higgs boson,<br />I have one question, (and I must say that dewey dow is 100% accurate on inflammatory progaganda vocabulare, hell, this January 16, 2000 "The Burlington Free Press" of Vermont article is titled, "Scientists try to find the 'God particle') ....so,<br />what I am getting around to saying is, I think the "Higgs boson" subatomic particle of mass is necessary to identify to identify more about GLOBAL WARMING, but apparently, almost ten years now, and no news reports of it being more than theoretical still.<br /><br />That's all I'm trying to say, that this un-identified theoretical subatomic particle of mass would have to be part of any equation in global warming.<br /><br />And as to advertising, sell a bright red car with a dumb looking blond every time, all advertising is inflammatory, bodily, mentally, etc. color, words, sounds can control the masses,<br /><br />so then we have to figure in the Higgs boson subatomic particle of mass and inflammatory colors and sounds<br />and<br />global warmings<br />and put them all<br />in the same equation,<br />because color is coming at us from<br />all directions as well as sound,<br />it all has to be in the<br />equation for global warming,<br />not just temperature and<br />emissions.<br /><br />In other words, part of "selling" theoretical science is<br />SIMPLIFYING IT FOR THE MASS AUDIENCE, RATHER THAN <br />ADMITTING THE COMPLEXITY.<br /><br />So, next time you have a "brand spanking new" theory,<br />keep it simple<br />in order to "sell" it.<br /><br />and be sure to use inflammatory phrases like<br />"brand spanking new".USMJP.com United States Marijuana Partyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16482200763572291499noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-39467493541872072322009-12-26T23:11:40.611+00:002009-12-26T23:11:40.611+00:00Interesting that you should assume I am a paid hac...Interesting that you should assume I am a paid hack. I am not a scientist, not even employed (retired). I worked for 30 years as a PR executive and learned a little about how to spot propaganda. For people seriously concerned about knowing who the climate deniers really are, I recommend a good book by another long-time corporate PR man, James Hoggan, who wrote "Climate Coverup."<br />(Hint: deniers=polluters)dewey dowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08584112212055933895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-61740254362252700712009-12-26T22:58:31.363+00:002009-12-26T22:58:31.363+00:00Another sign of fraud is that the method chosen to...Another sign of fraud is that the method chosen to to reduce CO2 will do nothing to reduce CO2 and in fact may very well make things worse.<br /><br />And all those taxes collected for nothing (or worse) are straight up waste designed to line the pockets of those involved in the fraud.<br /><br />Look up what Pachauri (head of the IPCC) looks to gain personally from perpetuation of the fraud.<br /><br />I have written about it on this blog: <a href="http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2009/12/climate-cartel.html" rel="nofollow">Climate Cartel</a>. It is not like I haven't attempted to keep you informed.M. Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09508934110558197375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-38330399158286497032009-12-26T22:50:53.173+00:002009-12-26T22:50:53.173+00:00Dewy,
Ah. Yes. So true.
Except if the planet is ...Dewy,<br /><br />Ah. Yes. So true.<br /><br />Except if the planet is cooling and the "scientists" are predicting warming they are wrong.<br /><br />And if the "scientists" know they are wrong and still promote their AGW, it is fraud.<br /><br />And the scientists know they are wrong. Otherwise why would they have to <b>Hide The Decline</b>?<br /><br />How much is the <b>Climate Cartel</b>, otherwise known as <b>Big Carbon</b> paying you Dewy?M. Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09508934110558197375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8282587.post-32106853946493033662009-12-26T15:40:22.764+00:002009-12-26T15:40:22.764+00:00Anyone who takes a good college course in public r...Anyone who takes a good college course in public relations learns how to spot (and discount) propaganda words and devices used to warp arguments in a particular direction. <br />I zipped through your screed and quickly found several of these inflammatory words and phrases which are typical of one-sided propagandists:<br /><br />scam<br />contrived<br />concocted<br />disguised<br />chicanery<br />prostitutes<br />environmentalism replaced Stalinism<br />irrational hysteria<br />similarity of techniques to Nazis and communists<br /><br />Not exactly the kind of language used by someone guided by objectivity.dewey dowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08584112212055933895noreply@blogger.com